Residents fear that Hanging Heaton is being turned into a 'concrete jungle'
![Residents, from the left, Stephen Crossley, Sarah Gomersall and Derek Crossley objecting to plans for new homes on four acres of fields off High Street and Challenge Way in Hanging Heaton](https://www.dewsburyreporter.co.uk/webimg/QVNIMTIyODI1Mzcx.jpg?crop=3:2,smart&width=640&quality=65&enable=upscale)
![Residents, from the left, Stephen Crossley, Sarah Gomersall and Derek Crossley objecting to plans for new homes on four acres of fields off High Street and Challenge Way in Hanging Heaton](/img/placeholder.png)
Laura Shaw says she feels semi-rural Hanging Heaton is being turned into “a concrete jungle” by plans to turn green spaces over to housing.
She and neighbours are fighting to stop 55 homes being built on four acres of fields off High Street and Challenge Way in Hanging Heaton, which is partly in both Batley and Dewsbury.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdIt is close to the massive Chidswell project, where 1,500 homes will eventually be built on a 296-acre site.
![Land next to Hanging Heaton Working Men's Club where there are plans to build houses.](https://www.dewsburyreporter.co.uk/webimg/QVNIMTIyODI1Mzcy.jpg?crop=3:2,smart&width=640&quality=65)
![Land next to Hanging Heaton Working Men's Club where there are plans to build houses.](/img/placeholder.png)
Laura said: “It is entirely changing the landscape of where we live.
“This is land that has never been developed. You lose land like that at your peril. Once it’s gone, it’s gone.
“It breaks my heart. It feels like we are being pushed out. I don’t want to move because that’s the home we thought we would be bringing up our children in, but it’s not how I want us to live.”
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdLaura’s household is one of several that hired a solicitor to object on their behalf. A 23-page letter outlining those objections has gone to Kirklees Council, where planning staff have recommended the scheme for approval at a meeting later this week.
And Laura, who has lived overlooking the fields for eight years, says she hopes comments by Prime Minister Boris Johnson at the Conservative Party Conference last week will come to pass.
In his conference speech Mr Johnson appeared to indicate that brownfield sites would now become the Government’s focus.
That would mean a U-turn on proposed planning reforms and a move away from greenfield sites.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdLaura intends to speak at a meeting of the council’s Heavy Woollen Planning Committee on Thursday, October 14.
She will highlight a range of concerns including flooding, pollution from the nearby B6128 Challenge Way, where a belt of trees that screens the road is to be partially cut down, and privacy issues from the proximity of the new estate.
She says noise and traffic surveys were conducted during lockdown and are not representative of the “hundreds more cars” that use the B6168.
And she says a report to the committee makes no mention of flooding that regularly affects the fields – or two underground streams that flow through houses and a nearby club.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdShe said: “Hanging Heaton is a village community. It was mentioned in the Domesday Book and is known for being semi-rural. That’s why people live here.
“That village atmosphere will become urban sprawl when the land is eaten up.
“This development adds nothing to the local community. I agree that we need houses but we need to build them in the right place, not on greenfield land.
“I hope there will be a change and that there’s a focus on brownfield sites.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide Ad"Unfortunately reform isn’t going to come quick enough to stop this but it’s a step in the right direction.”
Castleford-based Vistry Partnerships Yorkshire aims to build a mix of detached, semi-detached and terraced homes on the land with access from Challenge Way.
A report to the committee says the proposed estate “would notably change the character and appearance of the site and wider area.
“However, as existing, the site is considered detrimental to the visual amenity of the built environment.
“The proposed development is considered to be sufficiently well-designed and it would result in an attractive continuation of the residential environment.”